Ramsey, B. W., Nepom, G. T. & Lonial, S. Academic, foundation, and industry collaboration in finding new therapies. N. Engl. J. Med. 376, 1762–1769 (2017).
Butler, D. Translational research: crossing the valley of death. Nature 453, 840–842 (2008).
DiMasi, J. A., Grabowski, H. G. & Hansen, R. W. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: new estimates of R&D costs. J. Health Econ. 47, 20–33 (2016).
Wouters, O. J., McKee, M. & Luyten, J. Estimated research and development investment needed to bring a new medicine to market, 2009–2018. JAMA 323, 844–853 (2020).
Subbiah, V. A global effort to understand the riddles of COVID-19 and cancer. Nat. Cancer 1, 943–945 (2020).
Flaherty, K. T. et al. Rethinking cancer clinical trial conduct induced by COVID-19: an academic center, industry, government, and regulatory agency perspective. Cancer Discov. 11, 1881–1885 (2021).
Samimi, G. et al. Lessons learned from the impact of COVID-19 on NCI-sponsored cancer prevention clinical trials: moving toward participant-centric study designs. Cancer Prev. Res. 15, 279–284 (2022).
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (NCCDPHP). Health and Economic Costs of Chronic Diseases https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/programs-impact/pop/index.htm (2022).
Menta, A. K., Subbiah, I. M. & Subbiah, V. Bringing wearable devices into oncology practice: fitting smart technology in the clinic. Discov. Med. 26, 261–270 (2018).
Krittanawong, C., Johnson, K. W. & Tang, W. W. How artificial intelligence could redefine clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine: lessons learned from oncology. Per. Med. 16, 83–88 (2019).
Subbiah, V. & Kurzrock, R. Challenging standard-of-care paradigms in the precision oncology era. Trends Cancer 4, 101–109 (2018).
Woodcock, J. & LaVange, L. M. Master protocols to study multiple therapies, multiple diseases, or both. N. Engl. J. Med. 377, 62–70 (2017).
Park, J. J. H. et al. Systematic review of basket trials, umbrella trials, and platform trials: a landscape analysis of master protocols. Trials 20, 572 (2019).
Dickson, D. et al. The master observational trial: a new class of master protocol to advance precision medicine. Cell 180, 9–14 (2020).
Das, S. & Lo, A. W. Re-inventing drug development: a case study of the I-SPY 2 breast cancer clinical trials program. Contemp. Clin. Trials 62, 168–174 (2017).
Redman, M. W. et al. Biomarker-driven therapies for previously treated squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (Lung-MAP SWOG S1400): a biomarker-driven master protocol. Lancet Oncol. 21, 1589–1601 (2020).
Subbiah, V. et al. Pan-cancer efficacy of vemurafenib in BRAFV600-mutant non-melanoma cancers. Cancer Discov. 10, 657–663 (2020).
Subbiah, V. et al. Dabrafenib and trametinib treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic BRAFV600-mutant anaplastic thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 36, 7–13 (2018).
Subbiah, V. et al. Pan-cancer efficacy of pralsetinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumors from the phase 1/2 ARROW trial. Nat. Med. 28, 1640–1645 (2022).
Drilon, A. et al. Efficacy of selpercatinib in RET fusion–positive non–small-cell lung cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 383, 813–824 (2020).
Subbiah, V. et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 23, 1261–1273 (2022).
Normand, S.-L. T. The RECOVERY platform. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 757–758 (2020).
Turner, N. C. et al. Circulating tumour DNA analysis to direct therapy in advanced breast cancer (plasmaMATCH): a multicentre, multicohort, phase 2a, platform trial. Lancet Oncol. 21, 1296–1308 (2020).
Gold, S. M. et al. Platform trials and the future of evaluating therapeutic behavioural interventions. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 7–8 (2022).
Dickson, D. et al. Snapshot: trial types in precision medicine. Cell 181, 208 (2020).
Ochoa, D. et al. Human genetics evidence supports two-thirds of the 2021 FDA-approved drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 551 (2022).
Wickström, K. & Moseley, J. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints in drug development: a european regulatory view. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 58, BIO27–BIO33 (2017).
Robb, M. A., McInnes, P. M. & Califf, R. M. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: developing common terminology and definitions. JAMA 315, 1107–1108 (2016).
Landers, M., Dorsey, R. & Saria, S. Digital endpoints: definition, benefits, and current barriers in accelerating development and adoption. Digit. Biomark. 5, 216–223 (2021).
Yang, Y. et al. Artificial intelligence-enabled detection and assessment of Parkinson’s disease using nocturnal breathing signals. Nat. Med. 28, 2207–2215 (2022).
Perez, M. V. et al. Large-scale assessment of a smartwatch to identify atrial fibrillation. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 1909–1917 (2019).
Guo, Y. et al. Mobile photoplethysmographic technology to detect atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 74, 2365–2375 (2019).
Lubitz, S. A. et al. Rationale and design of a large population study to validate software for the assessment of atrial fibrillation from data acquired by a consumer tracker or smartwatch: the Fitbit Heart Study. Am. Heart J. 238, 16–26 (2021).
Rizas, K. D. et al. Smartphone-based screening for atrial fibrillation: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Nat. Med. 28, 1823–1830 (2022).
FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK326791/ (2016).
Desai, A. & Subbiah, V. COVID-19 pandemic and cancer clinical trial pandemonium: finding the silver lining. J. Immunother. Precis. Oncol. 4, 64–66 (2020).
Acosta, J. N., Falcone, G. J., Rajpurkar, P. & Topol, E. J. Multimodal biomedical AI. Nat. Med. 28, 1773–1784 (2022).
Food and Drug Administration. Digital health technologies for remote data acquisition in clinical investigations, draft guidance for industry, investigators, and other stakeholders. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/digital-health-technologies-remote-data-acquisition-clinical-investigations (2022).
Thomas, K. A. & Kidziński, Ł. Artificial intelligence can improve patients’ experience in decentralized clinical trials. Nat. Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-02034-4 (2022).
Wong, D. R., Bhattacharya, S. & Butte, A. J. Prototype of running clinical trials in an untrustworthy environment using blockchain. Nat. Commun. 10, 917 (2019).
Brown, D. G., Wobst, H. J., Kapoor, A., Kenna, L. A. & Southall, N. Clinical development times for innovative drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 793–794 (2021).
Anderson, A. S. A lightspeed approach to pandemic drug development. Nat. Med. 28, 1538 (2022).
Subbiah, V. et al. Accelerated approvals hit the target in precision oncology. Nat. Med. 28, 1976–1979 (2022).
Kepplinger, E. E. FDA’s expedited approval mechanisms for new drug products. Biotechnol. Law Rep. 34, 15–37 (2015).
Ncube, B. M., Dube, A. & Ward, K. Establishment of the African Medicines Agency: progress, challenges and regulatory readiness. J. Pharm. Policy Pract. 14, 29 (2021).
Moyers, J. T. & Subbiah, V. Think globally, act locally: globalizing precision oncology. Cancer Discov. 12, 886–888 (2022).
Degtiar, I. & Rose, S. A review of generalizability and transportability. Annu. Rev. Stat. Appl. 10, 1 (2023).
Ramagopalan, S. V. et al. Transportability of overall survival estimates from US to Canadian patients with advanced non–small cell lung cancer with implications for regulatory and health technology assessment. JAMA Netw. Open 5, e2239874 (2022).
Nguengang Wakap, S. et al. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 28, 165–173 (2020).
Pizzamiglio, C., Vernon, H. J., Hanna, M. G. & Pitceathly, R. D. S. Designing clinical trials for rare diseases: unique challenges and opportunities. Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 2, 13 (2022).
Food and Drug Administration. FDA approves alpelisib for PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-alpelisib-pik3ca-related-overgrowth-spectrum (2022).
Food and Drug Administration. Real-time oncology review. https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/oncology-center-excellence/real-time-oncology-review (2022).
Food and Drug Administration. Assessment aid. https://www.fda.gov/about-fda/oncology-center-excellence/assessment-aid (2022).
Lillie, E. O. et al. The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine? Per. Med. 8, 161–173 (2011).
Kim, J. et al. Patient-customized oligonucleotide therapy for a rare genetic disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 1644–1652 (2019).
Fajgenbaum, D. C. et al. Identifying and targeting pathogenic PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in IL-6 blockade–refractory idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease. J. Clin. Investig. 129, 4451–4463 (2019).
Subbiah, V. et al. Selective RET kinase inhibition for patients with RET-altered cancers. Ann. Oncol. 29, 1869–1876 (2018).
Woodcock, J. & Marks, P. Drug regulation in the era of individualized therapies. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 1678–1680 (2019).
Björnsson, B. et al. Digital twins to personalize medicine. Genome Med. 12, 4 (2019).
Laubenbacher, R., Sluka, J. P. & Glazier, J. A. Using digital twins in viral infection. Science 371, 1105–1106 (2021).
Sherman, R. E., Davies, K. M., Robb, M. A., Hunter, N. L. & Califf, R. M. Accelerating development of scientific evidence for medical products within the existing US regulatory framework. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16, 297–298 (2017).
Concato, J. & Corrigan-Curay, J. Real-world evidence—where are we now? N. Engl. J. Med. 386, 1680–1682 (2022).
Concato, J., Stein, P., Dal Pan, G. J., Ball, R. & Corrigan-Curay, J. Randomized, observational, interventional, and real-world—what’s in a name? Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 29, 1514–1517 (2020).
Food and Drug Administration. Real-world evidence. https://www.fda.gov/science-research/science-and-research-special-topics/real-world-evidence (2022).
Mishra-Kalyani, P. S. et al. External control arms in oncology: current use and future directions. Ann. Oncol. 33, 376–383 (2022).
Popat, S. et al. Addressing challenges with real-world synthetic control arms to demonstrate the comparative effectiveness of pralsetinib in non-small cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 13, 3500 (2022).
Gainor, J. F. et al. Pralsetinib for RET fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (ARROW): a multi-cohort, open-label, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol. 22, 959–969 (2021).
Subbiah, V. et al. Pralsetinib for patients with advanced or metastatic RET-altered thyroid cancer (ARROW): a multi-cohort, open-label, registrational, phase 1/2 study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 9, 491–501 (2021).
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration. NDA multi-disciplinary review and evaluation: NDA 213756 Koselugo (selumetinib). https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2020/213756Orig1s000MultidisciplineR.pdf (2020).
Casey, D. et al. FDA approval summary: selumetinib for plexiform neurofibroma. Clin. Cancer Res. 27, 4142–4146 (2021).
Wilkinson, S. et al. Assessment of alectinib vs ceritinib in ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer in phase 2 trials and in real-world data. JAMA Netw. Open 4, e2126306 (2021).
Bartlett, R. H. et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in neonatal respiratory failure. 100 cases. Ann. Surg. 204, 236–245 (1986).
McCune, S. & Portman, R. J. Innovation and opportunities in pediatric therapeutic development. Ther. Innov. Regul. Sci. 53, 564–566 (2019).
Subbiah, V. Fast-tracking novel drugs in pediatric oncology. Cell Cycle 14, 1127–1128 (2015).
Rajpurkar, P., Chen, E., Banerjee, O. & Topol, E. J. AI in health and medicine. Nat. Med. 28, 31–38 (2022).
Weissler, E. H. et al. The role of machine learning in clinical research: transforming the future of evidence generation. Trials 22, 537 (2021).
Adashek, J. J., Subbiah, I. M. & Subbiah, V. Artificial intelligence systems assisting oncologists? Resist and desist or enlist and coexist. Oncologist 24, 1291–1293 (2019).
Topol, E. J. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nat. Med. 25, 44–56 (2019).
Liu, X. et al. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Nat. Med. 26, 1364–1374 (2020).
Cruz Rivera, S. et al. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension. Nat. Med. 26, 1351–1363 (2020).
Kickingereder, P. et al. Automated quantitative tumour response assessment of MRI in neuro-oncology with artificial neural networks: a multicentre, retrospective study. Lancet Oncol. 20, 728–740 (2019).
Jarow, J. P., LaVange, L. & Woodcock, J. Multidimensional evidence generation and FDA regulatory decision making: defining and using “real-world” data. JAMA 318, 703–704 (2017).
Dean, B. Social network usage & growth statistics: how many people use social media in 2022? Backlinko https://backlinko.com/social-media-users (2021).
Wicks, P., Vaughan, T. E., Massagli, M. P. & Heywood, J. Accelerated clinical discovery using self-reported patient data collected online and a patient-matching algorithm. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 411–414 (2011).
Morgan, G. et al. The (r)evolution of social media in oncology: engage, enlighten, and encourage. Cancer Discov. 12, 1620–1624 (2022).
Pessoa-Amorim, G. et al. Making trials part of good clinical care: lessons from the RECOVERY trial. Future Healthc. J. 8, e243–e250 (2021).