Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: results from the 2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration https://www.samhsa.gov/data/ (2021).
McKetta, S. & Keyes, K. M. Heavy and binge alcohol drinking and parenting status in the United States from 2006 to 2018: an analysis of nationally representative cross-sectional surveys. PLoS Med. 16, e1002954 (2019).
Acuff, S. F., Strickland, J. C., Tucker, J. A. & Murphy, J. G. Changes in alcohol use during COVID-19 and associations with contextual and individual difference variables: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 36, 1–19 (2022).
Global Status Report On Alcohol And Health 2018. WHO https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639 (2018).
World Drug Report 2021. United Nations https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/data-and-analysis/wdr2021.html (2021).
Tapper, E. B. & Parikh, N. D. Mortality due to cirrhosis and liver cancer in the United States, 1999–2016: observational study. BMJ 362, k2817 (2018).
Long-term trends in deaths of despair; Report Of The Social Capital Project. Joint Economic Committee https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/_cache/files/0f2d3dba-9fdc-41e5-9bd1-9c13f4204e35/jec-report-deaths-of-despair.pdf (2019).
White, A. M., Castle, I.-J. P., Powell, P. A., Hingson, R. W. & Koob, G. F. Alcohol-related deaths during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 327, 1704–1706 (2022).
Remington, P. L. & Brownson, R. C. Fifty years of progress in chronic disease epidemiology and control. Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 60, 70–77 (2011).
Sacks, J. J., Gonzales, K. R., Bouchery, E. E., Tomedi, L. E. & Brewer, R. D. 2010 national and state costs of excessive alcohol consumption. Am. J. Prev. Med. 49, e73–e79 (2015).
Friedman, J., Beletsky, L. & Schriger, D. L. Overdose-related cardiac arrests observed by emergency medical services during the US COVID-19 epidemic. JAMA Psychiat. 78, 562–564 (2020).
Patterson, S., Westfall, J. & Miller, B. F. Projected Deaths Of Despair During The Coronavirus Recession (Well Being Trust, 2020).
Bickel, W. K. & Athamneh, L. N. A reinforcer pathology perspective on relapse. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 113, 48–56 (2020).
Bickel, W. K., Johnson, M. W., Koffarnus, M. N., MacKillop, J. & Murphy, J. G. The behavioral economics of substance use disorders: reinforcement pathologies and their repair. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 10, 641–677 (2014).
Rachlin, H. Four teleological theories of addiction. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 4, 462–473 (1997).
Murphy, J. G. & MacKillop, J. Relative reinforcing efficacy of alcohol among college student drinkers. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 14, 219–227 (2006).
Zhang, S. et al. A Bayesian hierarchical model for individual participant data meta-analysis of demand curves. Stat. Med. 41, 2276–2290 (2022).
Kaplan, B. A. et al. Understanding alcohol motivation using the alcohol purchase task: a methodological systematic review. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 191, 117–140 (2018).
Martínez-Loredo, V., González-Roz, A., Secades-Villa, R., Fernández-Hermida, J. R. & MacKillop, J. Concurrent validity of the Alcohol Purchase Task for measuring the reinforcing efficacy of alcohol: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15379 (2020).
Jacobs, E. A. & Bickel, W. K. Modeling drug consumption in the clinic using simulation procedures: demand for heroin and cigarettes in opioid-dependent outpatients. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 7, 412–426 (1999).
Lemley, S. M., Kaplan, B. A., Reed, D. D., Darden, A. C. & Jarmolowicz, D. P. Reinforcer pathologies: predicting alcohol related problems in college drinking men and women. Drug. Alcohol. Depend 167, 57–66 (2016).
Pickover, A. M., Messina, B. G., Correia, C. J., Garza, K. B. & Murphy, J. G. A behavioral economic analysis of the nonmedical use of prescription drugs among young adults. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 24, 38–47 (2016).
Aston, E. R., Metrik, J., Amlung, M. T., Kahler, C. W. & MacKillop, J. Interrelationships between marijuana demand and discounting of delayed rewards: convergence in behavioral economic methods. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 169, 141–147 (2016).
Petry, N. M. & Bickel, W. K. Polydrug abuse in heroin addicts: a behavioral economic analysis. Addiction 93, 321–335 (1998).
Acuff, S. F., Soltis, K. E., Dennhardt, A. A., Berlin, K. S. & Murphy, J. G. Evaluating behavioral economic models of heavy drinking among college students. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res 42, 1304–1314 (2018).
Aston, E. R., Metrik, J. & MacKillop, J. Further validation of a marijuana purchase task. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 152, 32–38 (2015).
Bertholet, N., Murphy, J. G., Daeppen, J. B., Gmel, G. & Gaume, J. The alcohol purchase task in young men from the general population. Drug. Alcohol. Depend 146, 39–44 (2015).
Gex, K. S. et al. Change in alcohol demand following a brief intervention predicts change in alcohol use: a latent growth curve analysis. Alcohol Clin. Exp. Res. 46, 1525–1538 (2022).
Gaume, J. et al. Behavioral economics indices predict alcohol use and consequences in young men at 4-year follow-up. Addiction 117, 2816–2825 (2022).
Mazur, J. E. in The Effect Of Delay And Of Intervening Events On Reinforcement Value (eds Commons, M. L., Mazur, J. E., Nevin, J. A. & Rachlin, H.) 55–73 (Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987).
Ainslie, G. & Herrnstein, R. J. Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement. Anim. Learn. Behav 9, 476–482 (1981).
Vuchinich, R. E. & Heather, N. (eds) Choice, Behavioural Economics And Addiction (Pergamon/Elsevier Science, 2003).
Vuchinich, R. E. Alcohol abuse as molar choice: an update of a 1982 proposal. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 9, 223–235 (1995).
Odum, A. L. & Rainaud, C. P. Discounting of delayed hypothetical money, alcohol, and food. Behav. Process. 64, 305–313 (2003).
Odum, A. L. et al. Delay discounting of different outcomes: review and theory. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 113, 657–679 (2020).
Rung, J. M. & Madden, G. J. Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 147, 1349–13831 (2018).
Voss, A. T., Jorgensen, M. K. & Murphy, J. G. Episodic future thinking as a brief alcohol intervention for heavy drinking college students: a pilot feasibility study. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 30, 313–325 (2021).
Stein, J. S., Tegge, A. N., Turner, J. K. & Bickel, W. K. Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette demand: an investigation of the good-subject effect. J. Behav. Med. 41, 269–276 (2018).
Bulley, A. & Gullo, M. J. The influence of episodic foresight on delay discounting and demand for alcohol. Addict. Behav. 66, 1–6 (2017).
Bickel, W. K. et al. in Recent Advances In Research On Impulsivity And Impulsive Behaviors (eds De Wit, H. & Jentsch, J. D.) 139–162 (Springer, 2020).
Hursh, S. R. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 34, 219–238 (1980).
Hursh, S. R. Behavioral economics. J. Exp. Anal. Behav 42, 435–452 (1984).
Heyman, G. M. How individuals make choices explains addiction’s distinctive, non-eliminable features. Behav. Brain Res. 397, 112899 (2021).
Hume, D. A Treatise Of Human Nature (eds Norton, D. F. & Norton, M. J.) (Clarendon Press, 2000).
Tucker, J. A., Buscemi, J., Murphy, J. G., Reed, D. D. & Vuchinich, R. E. Addictive behavior as molar behavioral allocation: distinguishing efficient and final causes in translational research and practice. Psychol. Addict. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000845 (2022).
Heilig, M., Mackillop, J. & Leggio, L. Addiction as a brain disease revised: why it still matters, and the need for consilience. Neuropsychopharmacology https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-020-00950-y (2021).
Volkow, N. D., Koob, G. F. & McLellan, A. T. Neurobiologic advances from the brain disease model of addiction. N. Engl. J. Med. 374, 363–371 (2016).
Bennett, A. & Golub, A. in APA Addiction Syndrome Handbook Vol. 1 Foundations, Influences, And Expressions Of Addiction (eds Shaffer, H. J., LaPlante, D. A. & Nelson, S. E.) 195–210 (American Psychological Association, 2012).
Singer, M. Anthropology and addiction: an historical review. Addiction 107, 1747–1755 (2012).
Acuff, S. F. & Murphy, J. G. Commentary on Martínez-Loredo et al.: Where do we go from here? Increasing the clinical utility of alcohol purchase tasks by expanding our definition of constraint. Addiction 116, 2651–2652 (2021).
Amlung, M. T. & MacKillop, J. Understanding the effects of stress and alcohol cues on motivation for alcohol via behavioral economics. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 38, 17801789 (2014).
Rose, A. K., Brown, K., MacKillop, J., Field, M. & Hogarth, L. Alcohol devaluation has dissociable effects on distinct components of alcohol behaviour. Psychopharmacology 235, 1233–1244 (2018).
Ferguson, E., Bush, N., Yurasek, A. & Boissoneault, J. The effect of next day responsibilities and an adaptive purchase task on cannabis demand. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 227, 108919 (2021).
Joyner, K. J. et al. High opportunity cost demand as an indicator of weekday drinking and distinctly severe alcohol problems: a behavioral economic analysis. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 43, 2607–2619 (2019).
Acuff, S. F., MacKillop, J. & Murphy, J. G. Integrating behavioral economic and social network influences in understanding alcohol misuse among emerging adults. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14351 (2020).
Acuff, S. F., Soltis, K. E. & Murphy, J. G. Using demand curves to quantify the reinforcing value of social and solitary drinking. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 44, 1497–1507 (2020).
Acuff, S. F., Amlung, M. T., Dennhardt, A. A., MacKillop, J. & Murphy, J. G. Experimental manipulations of behavioral economic demand for addictive commodities: a meta-analysis. Addiction 115, 817–831 (2020).
Bujarski, S., MacKillop, J. & Ray, L. A. Understanding naltrexone mechanism of action and pharmacogenetics in Asian Americans via behavioral economics: a preliminary study. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 20, 181–190 (2012).
Dennhardt, A. A., Yurasek, A. M. & Murphy, J. G. Change in delay discounting and substance reward value following a brief alcohol and drug use intervention. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 103, 125–140 (2015).
Koffarnus, M. N., Jarmolowicz, D. P., Mueller, E. T. & Bickel, W. K. Changing delay discounting in the light of the competing neurobehavioral decision systems theory: a review. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 99, 32–57 (2013).
Berry, M. S., Sweeney, M. M., Morath, J., Odum, A. L. & Jordan, K. E. The nature of impulsivity: visual exposure to natural environments decreases impulsive decision-making in a delay discounting task. PLoS One 9, e97915 (2014).
Snider, S. E. et al. Reinforcer pathology: narrative of hurricane-associated loss increases delay discounting, demand, and consumption of highly palatable snacks in the obese. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 34, 136–146 (2020).
Bickel, W. K., George Wilson, A., Chen, C., Koffarnus, M. N. & Franck, C. T. Stuck in time: negative income shock constricts the temporal window of valuation spanning the future and the past. PLoS One 11, e0163051 (2016).
Sze, Y. Y., Stein, J. S., Bickel, W. K., Paluch, R. A. & Epstein, L. H. Bleak present, bright future: online episodic future thinking, scarcity, delay discounting, and food demand. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 5, 683–697 (2017).
Herrnstein, R. J. Formal properties of the matching law. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 21, 159–164 (1974).
Herrnstein, R. J. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 4, 267–272 (1961).
de Villiers, P. A. & Herrnstein, R. J. Toward a law of response strength. Psychol. Bull. 83, 1131–1153 (1976).
Rachlin, H. On the tautology of the matching law. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 15, 249–251 (1971).
Acuff, S. F., Dennhardt, A. A., Correia, C. J. & Murphy, J. G. Measurement of substance-free reinforcement in addiction: a systematic review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 70, 79–90 (2019).
Hunt, P. S., Lant, G. M. & Carroll, C. A. Enhanced intake of ethanol in preweanling rats following interactions with intoxicated siblings. Dev. Psychobiol. 37, 90–99 (2000).
Carroll, M. E. in Advances In Behavioral Economics 37–68 (Ablex Publishing, 1996).
Carroll, M. E., Krattiger, K. L., Gieske, D. & Sadoff, D. A. Cocaine-base smoking in rhesus monkeys: reinforcing and physiological effects. Psychopharmacology https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247123 (1990).
Griffiths, R. R., Troisi, J. R. II, Silverman, K. & Mumford, G. K. Multiple choice procedure: an efficient approach for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Behav. Pharmacol. 4, 3–13 (1993).
Griffiths, R. R., Bigelow, G. E. & Liebson, I. A. Effect of ethanol self-administration on choice behavior: money vs. socializing. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 3, 443–446 (1975).
Griffiths, R. R., Rush, C. R. & Puhala, K. A. Validation of the multiple-choice procedure for investigating drug reinforcement in humans. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.4.1.97 (1996).
Ahmed, S. H. Trying to make sense of rodents’ drug choice behavior. Prog. Neuro-psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiat. 87, 3–10 (2018).
Ahmed, S. H. & Koob, G. F. Transition from moderate to excessive drug intake: change in hedonic set point. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5387.298 (1998).
Augier, E. et al. A molecular mechanism for choosing alcohol over an alternative reward. Science 360, 1321–1326 (2018).
Ahmed, S. H. Individual decision-making in the causal pathway to addiction: contributions and limitations of rodent models. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 164, 22–31 (2018).
Hutsell, B. A., Negus, S. S. & Banks, M. L. A generalized matching law analysis of cocaine vs. food choice in rhesus monkeys: effects of candidate “agonist-based” medications on sensitivity to reinforcement. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 146, 52–60 (2015).
Chow, J. J. & Beckmann, J. S. Remifentanil–food choice follows predictions of relative subjective value. Drug. Alcohol Depend. 218, 108369 (2021).
Negus, S. S. Rapid assessment of choice between cocaine and food in rhesus monkeys: effects of environmental manipulations andtreatment with d-amphetamine and flupenthixol. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 919–931 (2003).
Madsen, H. B. & Ahmed, S. H. Drug versus sweet reward: greater attraction to and preference for sweet versus drug cues. Addict. Biol. 20, 433–444 (2015).
Herrnstein, R. J. & Prelec, D. in Choice Over Time (eds Loewenstein, G. & Elster, J.) 331–361 (Sage, 1992).
Heyman, G. M. Consumption dependent changes in reward value: a framework for understanding addiction. In Choice, Behavioural Economics And Addiction (eds Vuchinich, R. E. & Heather, N.) 95–127 (Pergamon/Elsevier Science, 2003).
Heyman, G. M. & Dunn, B. Decision biases and persistent illicit drug use: an experimental study of distributed choice and addiction. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 67, 193–203 (2002).
MacKillop, J. The behavioral economics and neuroeconomics of alcohol use disorders. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 40, 672–685 (2016).
Baum, W. M. On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 22, 231–242 (1974).
Alexander, B. K., Coambs, R. B. & Hadaway, P. F. The effect of housing and gender on morphine self-administration in rats. Psychopharmacology 58, 175–179 (1978).
Alexander, B. K., Beyerstein, B. L., Hadaway, P. F. & Coambs, R. B. Effect of early and later colony housing on oral ingestion of morphine in rats. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 15, 571–576 (1981).
Ginsburg, B. C. & Lamb, R. J. Frustration stress (unexpected loss of alternative reinforcement) increases opioid self-administration in a model of recovery. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 182, 33–39 (2018).
Smith, M. A. & Pitts, E. G. Access to a running wheel inhibits the acquisition of cocaine self-administration. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav 100, 237–243 (2011).
Cosgrove, K. P., Hunter, R. G. & Carroll, M. E. Wheel-running attenuates intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats: sex differences. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 73, 663–671 (2002).
Lenoir, M. & Ahmed, S. H. Supply of a nondrug substitute reduces escalated heroin consumption. Neuropsychopharmacology 33, 2272–2282 (2008).
Huynh, C., Fam, J., Ahmed, S. H. & Clemens, K. J. Rats quit nicotine for a sweet reward following an extensive history of nicotine use. Addict. Biol. 22, 142–151 (2017).
Carroll, M. E. Voluntary exercise as a treatment for incubated and expanded drug craving leading to relapse to addiction: animal models. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 208, 173210 (2021).
Miller, M. L. et al. Reciprocal inhibitory effects of intravenous d-methamphetamine self-administration and wheel activity in rats. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 121, 90–96 (2012).
Kim, J. S. & Kearns, D. N. Reduced ethanol self-administration in rats produced by the introduction of a high value non-drug alternative reinforcer. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 184, 139–148 (2019).
Venniro, M., Panlilio, L. V., Epstein, D. H. & Shaham, Y. The protective effect of operant social reward on cocaine self-administration, choice, and relapse is dependent on delay and effort for the social reward. Neuropsychopharmacology 46, 2350–2357 (2021).
Cohen, M., Liebson, I. A., Faillace, L. A. & Allen, R. P. Moderate drinking by chronic alcoholics: a schedule dependent phenomenon. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 153, 434–444 (1971).
Griffiths, R. R., Bigelow, G. E. & Liebson, I. A. Suppression of ethanol self-administration in alcoholics by contingent time-out from social interactions. Behav. Res. Ther. 12, 327–334 (1974).
Bigelow, G. E. in International Handbook Of Alcohol Dependence And Problems (eds Heather, N., Peters, T. J. & Stockwell, T.) 299–315 (Wiley, 2001).
Vuchinich, R. E. & Tucker, J. A. Behavioral theories of choice as a framework for studying drinking behavior. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 92, 408–416 (1983).
Higgins, S. T., Bickel, W. K. & Hughes, J. R. Influence of an alternative reinforcer on human cocaine self-administration. Life Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3205(94)00878-7 (1994).
Strickland, J. C. et al. Contribution of cocaine-related cues to concurrent monetary choice in humans. Psychopharmacology 235, 2871–2881 (2018).
Strickland, J. C., Lile, J. A. & Stoops, W. W. Contribution of cannabis-related cues to concurrent reinforcer choice in humans. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 199, 85–91 (2019).
Comer, S. D. et al. Effects of an alternative reinforcer on intravenous heroin self- administration by humans. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 345, 13–26 (1998).
Hogarth, L. & Hardy, L. Alcohol use disorder symptoms are associated with greater relative value ascribed to alcohol, but not greater discounting of costs imposed on alcohol. Psychopharmacology 235, 2257–2266 (2018).
Haney, M., Comer, S. D., Ward, A. S., Foltin, R. W. & Fischman, M. W. Factors influencing marijuana self-administration by humans. Behav. Pharmacol. 8, 101–112 (1997).
Lile, J. A. et al. Pharmacological validation of a translational model of cocaine use disorder: effects of d-amphetamine maintenance on choice between intravenous cocaine and a non-drug alternative in humans and rhesus monkeys. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 28, 169–180 (2020).
Hart, C. L., Haney, M., Foltin, R. W. & Fischman, M. W. Alternative reinforcers differentially modify cocaine self-administration by humans. Behav. Pharmacol. 11, 87–91 (2000).
Fischman, M. W. & Foltin, R. W. Self-administration of cocaine by humans: a laboratory perspective. Ciba Found. Symp. 166, 165–173 (1992).
Foltin, R. W., Haney, M., Bedi, G. & Evans, S. M. Modafinil decreases cocaine choice in human cocaine smokers only when the response requirement and the alternative reinforcer magnitude are large. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 150–151, 8–13 (2016).
Hogarth, L. & Field, M. Relative expected value of drugs versus competing rewards underpins vulnerability to and recovery from addiction. Behav. Brain Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112815 (2020).
Davison, M. & Baum, W. M. Choice in a variable environment: every reinforcer counts. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 74, 1–24 (2000).
Schneider, W. Reinforcer effectiveness as a function of reinforcer rate and magnitude: a comparison of concurrent performances. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 20, 461–471 (1973).
Young, J. S. Discrete-trial choice in pigeons: effects of reinforcer magnitude. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 35, 23–29 (1981).
Davison, M. & Baum, W. M. Every reinforcer counts: reinforcer magnitude and local preference. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 80, 95–129 (2003).
Hallgren, K. A., Greenfield, B. L. & Ladd, B. O. Psychometric properties of the Adolescent Reinforcement Survey Schedule — alcohol use version with college student drinkers. Subst. Use Misuse 51, 812–822 (2016).
Delmée, L., Roozen, H. G. & Steenhuis, I. The engagement of non-substance-related pleasant activities is associated with decreased levels of alcohol consumption in university students. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9857-5 (2017).
Audrain-McGovern, J. E., Rodriguez, D., Rodgers, K. & Cuevas, J. Declining alternative reinforcers link depression to young adult smoking. Addiction 106, 178–187 (2010).
Rogers, R. E. et al. Abstinence-contingent reinforcement and engagement in non-drug-related activities among illicit drug abusers. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 22, 544–550 (2008).
Meshesha, L. Z., Dennhardt, A. A. & Murphy, J. G. Polysubstance use is associated with deficits in substance-free reinforcement in college students. J. Stud. Alcohol. Drugs 76, 106–116 (2015).
Andrabi, N., Khoddam, R. & Leventhal, A. M. Socioeconomic disparities in adolescent substance use: role of enjoyable alternative substance-free activities. Soc. Sci. Med. 176, 175–182 (2017).
Andrabi, N., Leventhal, A. M. & Khoddam, R. Diminished alternative reinforcement mediates socioeconomic disparities in adolescent substance ase: a longitudinal study. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 171, e8 (2017).
Correia, C. J., Carey, K. B., Simons, J. S. & Borsari, B. E. Relationships between binge drinking and substance-free reinforcement in a sample of college students: a preliminary investigation. Addict. Behav. 28, 361–368 (2003).
Correia, C. J., Simons, J. S., Carey, K. B. & Borsari, B. E. Predicting drug use: application of behavioral theories of choice. Addict. Behav. 23, 705–709 (1998).
Van Etten, M. L., Higgins, S. T., Budney, A. J. & Badger, G. J. Comparison of the frequency and enjoyability of pleasant events in cocaine abusers vs. non-abusers using a standardized behavioral inventory. Addiction 93, 1669–1680 (1998).
Tucker, J. A., Chandler, S. D. & Witkiewitz, K. Epidemiology of recovery from alcohol use disorder. Alcohol. Res. Curr. Rev. 40, 1–12. (2020).
Lee, D. C., Stanger, C. & Budney, A. J. A comparison of delay discounting in adolescents and adults in treatment for cannabis use disorders. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038792 (2015).
Murphy, J. G. et al. Behavioral economic predictors of brief alcohol intervention outcomes. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 83, 1033–1043 (2015).
Schnoll, R. A. et al. Longitudinal changes in smoking abstinence symptoms and alternative reinforcers predict long-term smoking cessation outcomes. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 165, 245–252 (2016).
Worley, M. J., Shoptaw, S. J., Bickel, W. K. & Ling, W. Using behavioral economics to predict opioid use during prescription opioid dependence treatment. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 148, 62–68 (2015).
Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E. & Rippens, P. D. Predicting natural resolution of alcohol-related problems: a prospective behavioral economic analysis. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 10, 248–257 (2002).
Tucker, J. A., Cheong, J. W., James, T. G., Jung, S. & Chandler, S. D. Preresolution drinking problem severity profiles associated with stable moderation outcomes of natural recovery attempts. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 44, 738–745 (2020).
Tucker, J. A., Foushee, H. R. & Black, B. C. Behavioral economic analysis of natural resolution of drinking problems using IVR self-monitoring. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. 16, 332–340 (2008).
Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E. & Rippens, P. D. Environmental contexts surrounding resolution of drinking problems among problem drinkers with different help-seeking experiences. J. Stud. Alcohol 63, 334–341 (2002).
Tucker, J. A., Vuchinich, R. E. & Gladsjo, J. A. Environmental events surrounding natural recovery from alcohol-related problems. J. Addict. Nurs. https://doi.org/10.3109/10884609409021737 (1994).
Witkiewitz, K., Litten, R. Z. & Leggio, L. Advances in the science and treatment of alcohol use disorder. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax4043 (2019).
Vilsaint, C. L. et al. Development and validation of a Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10) for alcohol and drug use disorder. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 177, 71–76 (2017).
Best, D. & Hennessy, E. A. The science of recovery capital: where do we go from here? Addiction 117, 1139–1145 (2022).
McKay, J. R. Making the hard work of recovery more attractive for those with substance use disorders. Addiction 112, 751–757 (2017).
Higgins, S. T., Heil, S. H. & Lussier, J. P. Clinical implications of reinforcement as a determinant of substance use disorders. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 431–461 (2004).
Meyers, R. J., Roozen, H. G. & Smith, J. E. The community reinforcement approach. Alcohol. Res. Health 33, 380–388 (2011).
Petry, N. M., Martin, B., Cooney, J. L. & Kranzler, H. R. Give them prizes, and they will come: contingency management for treatment of alcohol dependence. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.2.250 (2000).
Petry, N. M., Barry, D., Alessi, S. M., Rounsaville, B. J. & Carroll, K. M. A randomized trial adapting contingency management targets based on initial abstinence status of cocaine-dependent patients. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026883 (2012).
Bolívar, H. A. et al. Contingency management for patients receiving medication for opioid use disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Psychiat. 78, 1092–1102 (2021).
Higgins, S. T. et al. A behavioral approach to achieving initial cocaine abstinence. Am. J. Psychiat. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.148.9.1218 (1991).
Davis, D. R. et al. A review of the literature on contingency management in the treatment of substance use disorders, 2009–2014. Prev. Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.08.008 (2016).
Petry, N. M., Alessi, S. M., Hanson, T. & Sierra, S. Randomized trial of contingent prizes versus vouchers in cocaine-using methadone patients. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 75, 983–991 (2007).
Rawson, R. A. et al. A comparison of contingency management and cognitive-behavioral approaches during methadone maintenance treatment for cocaine dependence. Psychosoc. Treat. 59, 87–104 (2003).
Epstein, D. H., Hawkins, W. E., Covi, L., Umbricht, A. & Preston, K. L. Cognitive-behavioral therapy plus contingency management for cocaine use: findings during treatment and across 12-month follow-up. Psychol. Addict. Behav. 17, 73–82 (2003).
Pfund, R. A., Ginley, M. K., Rash, C. J., & Zajac, K. Contingency management for treatment attendance: a meta-analysis. J. Subst. Abuse Treat 133, 108556 (2021).
Archer, M., Harwood, H., Stevelink, S., Rafferty, L. & Greenberg, N. Community reinforcement and family training and rates of treatment entry: a systematic review. Addiction 115, 1024–1037 (2020).
De Crescenzo, F. et al. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions for individuals with cocaine and amphetamine addiction: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS Med 15, e10027 (2018).
Lewinsohn, P. M. in The Psychology Of Depression: Contemporary Theory And Research 157–178 (1974).
Daughters, S. B., Magidson, J. F., Lejuez, C. W. & Chen, Y. LETS Act: a behavioral activation treatment for substance use and depression. Adv. Dual Diagn. 9, 74–84 (2016).
Daughters, S. B. et al. The effect of a behavioral activation treatment for substance use on post-treatment abstinence: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction 113, 535–544 (2018).
Murphy, J. G. et al. A randomized controlled trial of a behavioral economic supplement to brief motivational interventions for college drinking. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 80, 876–886 (2012).
Murphy, J. G. et al. A randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of a brief alcohol intervention supplemented with a substance-free activity session or relaxation training. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 87, 657–669 (2019).
Gex, K. S. et al. A randomized pilot trial of a mobile delivered brief motivational interviewing and behavioral economic alcohol intervention for emerging adults. Psychol. Addict. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000838 (2022).
Meshesha, L. Z. et al. Pilot trial investigating a brief behavioral economic intervention as an adjunctive treatment for alcohol use disorder. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 113, 108002 (2020).
Mulia, N., Tam, T., Bond, J., Zemore, S. E. & Li, L. Racial/ethnic differences in life-course heavy drinking from adolescence to midlife. J. Ethn. Subst. Abuse 17, 167–186 (2018).
Mulia, N., Zemore, S. E., Murphy, R., Liu, H. & Catalano, R. Economic loss and alcohol consumption and problems during the 2008 to 2009 U.S. recession. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 38, 1026–1034 (2014).
Probst, C., Roerecke, M., Behrendt, S. & Rehm, J. Gender differences in socioeconomic inequality of alcohol-attributable mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug. Alcohol. Rev 34, 267–277 (2015).
Matthay, E. C., Mousli, L., Ponicki, W. R., Glymour, M. M. & Apollonio, E. A spatiotemporal analysis of the association of California city and county cannabis policies with cannabis outlet densities. Epidemiology 33, 715–725 (2022).
Pedersen, E. R. et al. Examining associations between licensed and unlicensed outlet density and cannabis outcomes from preopening to postopening of recreational cannabis outlets. Am. J. Addict. 30, 122–130 (2021).
Lee, J. P., Ponicki, W., Mair, C., Gruenewald, P. & Ghanem, L. What explains the concentration of off-premise alcohol outlets in Black neighborhoods. SSM Popul. Health 12, 100669 (2020).
Romley, J. A., Cohen, D., Ringel, J. & Sturm, R. Alcohol and environmental justice: the density of liquor stores and bars in urban neighborhoods in the United States. J. Stud. Alcohol. Drugs 68, 48–55 (2007).
Brenner, A. B., Borrell, L. N., Barrientos-Gutierrez, T. & Diez Roux, A. V. Longitudinal associations of neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics and alcohol availability on drinking: results from the Multi-ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA). Soc. Sci. Med. 145, 17–25 (2015).
Hogarth, L. in Evaluating the Brain Disease Model of Addiction (Heather, N., Field, M., Moss, A. C. & Satel, S.) 216–236 (Routledge, 2022).
Lee, J. O. et al. Developmental pathways from parental socioeconomic status to adolescent substance use: alternative and complementary reinforcement. J. Youth Adolesc. 47, 334–348 (2018).
Oshri, A. et al. Socioeconomic hardship and delayed reward discounting: associations with working memory and emotional reactivity. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 37, 100642 (2019).
Mullins, T. S., Campbell, E. M. & Hogeveen, J. Neighborhood deprivation shapes motivational-neurocircuit recruitment in children. Psychol. Sci. 31, 881–889 (2020).
Collins, S. E. Associations between socioeconomic factors and alcohol outcomes. Alcohol. Res. Curr. Rev. 38, 83–94 (2016).
Rothstein, R. The Color Of Law (W. W. Norton Co., 2017).
Kamin, D. Home appraised with a black owner: $472,000. With a white owner: $750,000. The New York Times https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/18/realestate/housing-discrimination-maryland.html (2022).
Humphreys, K. & Rappaport, J. From the community mental health movement to the war on drugs: a study in the definition of social problems. Am. Psychol. 48, 892–901 (1993).
US Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse. Marihuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding (New American Library, 1972).
Nellis, A. The color of justice: racial and ethnic disparity in state prisons. Sentencing Project https://www.sentencingproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/The-Color-of-Justice-Racial-and-Ethnic-Disparity-in-State-Prisons.pdf{2c3a8711102f73ee058d83c6a8025dc7f37722aad075054eaafcf582b93871a0}7B{2c3a8711102f73ee058d83c6a8025dc7f37722aad075054eaafcf582b93871a0}5C{2c3a8711102f73ee058d83c6a8025dc7f37722aad075054eaafcf582b93871a0}25{2c3a8711102f73ee058d83c6a8025dc7f37722aad075054eaafcf582b93871a0}7D0A (2016).
Zapolski, T. C., Pedersen, S. L., McCarthy, D. M., & Smith, G. T. Less drinking, yet more problems: understanding African American drinking and related problems. Psychol. Bull. 140, 188–223 (2014).
Monnat, S. M. Factors associated with county-level differences in U.S. drug-related mortality rates. Am. J. Prev. Med. 54, 611–619 (2018).
Knapp, E. A., Bilal, U., Dean, L. T., Lazo, M. & Celentano, D. D. Economic insecurity and deaths of despair in US counties. Am. J. Epidemiol. 188, 2131–2139 (2019).
CDC vital signs: opioid prescribing. Center for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/opioids/index.html (2017).
Smallwood, R., Woods, C., Power, T. & Usher, K. Understanding the impact of historical trauma due to colonization on the health and well-being of indigenous young peoples: a systematic scoping review. J. Transcult. Nurs. 32, 59–68 (2021).
Spillane, S. et al. Trends in alcohol-induced deaths in the United States, 2000–2016. JAMA Netw. Open 3, e1921451 (2020).
Brave Heart, M. Y. H. et al. Psychiatric disorders and mental health treatment in American Indians and Alaska Natives: results of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Soc. Psychiat. Psychiatric Epidemiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-016-1225-4 (2016).
Santopietro, G. D. & Zipper, C. E. in Appalachia’s Coal-Mined Landscapes: Resources And Communities In A New Energy Era (eds Zipper, C. E. & Skousen, J.) 287–310 (Springer, 2021).
Sigfusdottir, I. D., Kristjansson, A. L., Thorlindsson, T. & Allegrante, J. P. Trends in prevalence of substance use among Icelandic adolescents, 1995–2006. Subst. Abuse Treat. Prev. Policy https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-597X-3-12 (2008).
Kristjansson, A. L. et al. Implementing the Icelandic model for preventing adolescent substance use. Health Promot. Pract. 21, 70–79 (2019).
Kristjansson, A. L., James, J. E., Allegrante, J. P., Sigfusdottir, I. D. & Helgason, A. R. Adolescent substance use, parental monitoring, and leisure-time activities: 12-year outcomes of primary prevention in Iceland. Prev. Med. 51, 168–171 (2010).
Kristjansson, A. L. et al. Population trends in smoking, alcohol use and primary prevention variables among adolescents in Iceland, 1997–2014. Addiction 111, 645–652 (2016).
Hibell, B. et al. The 2011 ESPAD Report: substance use among students in 36 European countries. ESPAD https://www.drugsandalcohol.ie/17644/ (2012).
Merrill, J. E. & Aston, E. R. Alcohol demand assessed daily: validity, variability, and the influence of drinking-related consequences. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.107838 (2020).
DePhilippis, D., Petry, N. M., Bonn-Miller, M. O., Rosenbach, S. B. & McKay, J. R. The national implementation of contingency management (CM) in the Department of Veterans Affairs: attendance at CM sessions and substance use outcomes. Drug. Alcohol. Depend. 185, 367–373 (2018).
Rachlin, H., Kagel, J. H. & Battalio, R. C. Substitutability in time allocation. Psychol. Rev. 87, 355–374 (1980).
William, B. M. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 32, 269–281 (1979).
Stewart, R. & Uggen, C. Criminal records and college admissions: a modified experimental audit. Criminology 58, 156–188 (2020).
Craigie, T. A. Ban the box, convictions, and public employment. Econ. Inq. 58, 425–445 (2020).